When and How Do You Address Sin in Counseling

My views on discussing sin are changing as with several other key issues. Previously, I was a believer in a “shine the light” philosophy. That is, speak the truth in love and you are doing what God would have you do. In reflecting more on this, I am now of the opinion that you have to meet the client where he or she currently is. I think the more that the client is strong in his or her faith, I would be open for direct confrontation. I would need to know if my client is aware of his or her sins. If so, is he or she repentant? If these are answered in the affirmative, then direct confrontation may likely be my best approach.

So many clients, however, enter counseling in self-doubt and with much guilt. In these cases, I can see the use of McMinn’s “empathic confrontation” (1996, p. 150) as a much more productive approach. If there is any doubt whether the addressing of sin could harm the client, it is my duty to be patient in this matter. The therapeutic relationship in these situations is more important that the confrontation of sin.

McMinn, M.R. (1996). Psychology, theology, and spirituality in Christian counseling. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.